Elbert Hubbard was a prolific writer of the early twentieth century. He was a major figure in the Arts and Crafts movement having establish a hand crafted publishing house called Roycrofters, famous for beautiful, illuminated limited edition volumes, bound in leather.
His book “Hollyhocks and Goldenglow” is a collection of essays on topics from the Titanic to Abdul Baha. (I recently made an entry on the Talisman9 discussion forum about this and what follows was drawn from that post.)He writes movingly about the Titanic recounting the bravery, loyalty and love of Mrs. Straus who refused to leave her husband for a life boat. Ironically Hubbard and his wife, Alice perished three years later aboard the Lusitania. Survivors told stories of their courage, matching the characteristics of Mrs. Straus.
There is also an essay about Abdul Baha entitled “A Modern Prophet.” The first sentence reads “A very great man has recently visited America.” It continues: “So out of Persia comes Abdul Baha, who calls himself “The Servant of God.” His followers are called Bahais. This man has diverted one-third of the population of Persia from Mohammedanism. …. This man is the modern Messiah.”
I find this essay an engrossing report by a non-Baha’i. Particularly interesting is this:
“Christian Science interests Abdul Baha greatly. It is somewhat humiliating thing for us when we think that this new American religion was never heard of by Abdul Baha until recently. Now he has practically embraced it. He says it represents one arc of the great circle of truth, and that if he had learned nothing else from his trip to America but the truths of Christian Science, he would be amply repaid.He says he comes more as a learner than a teacher. Nevertheless, he is obliged to give out the light that has been given to him. He keeps the good by giving it away.He quotes Ralph Waldo Emerson freely, delights in Walt Whitman, and loves the memory of Tolstoy, and is on terms of great tenderness toward every good and noble thing that makes for human betterment.No man of recent times has shown such a magnificent affirmative spirit as this Abdul Baha.”
Hubbard was a prolific writer who is not very well known today — not the household word one might think he would be. (The exception might be his “Message to Garcia” that I believe was read in grade or high schools years ago.)His contemporaneous account of Abdul Baha’s visit is precious I think. There may be errors in the essay but it rings true. He doesn’t say that he met Abdul Baha but I think he must have. Does anyone have knowledge of this possible meeting? I find the comments about Christian Science, Emerson and Whitman intriguing and perfectly consistent with my mental and emotional image of Abdul Baha and his approach to life.The book is available as a reprint or as an antique in its original leather bound form if you can find it.I love the idea that Abdul Baha quoted Emerson and loved Whitman but this is the only reference to that I know of. I think many Baha’is would reject the idea. If you are a Baha’i what do you think? And please let me know of other references like this that you are aware of.Many thanks,Frank

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 7, 2008 at 9:57 pm
Bill
I cannot imagine why any Baha’i would reject the idea that ‘Abdu’l-Baha enjoyed Emerson or Whitman. ‘Abdu’l-Baha was highly educated, cultured, and appreciative of refinement. The thought of Emerson and the poetry of Whitman are refined.
I think Hubbard’s notion that ‘Abdu’l-Baha “practically embraced” Christian Science perhaps a bit naive. ‘Abdu’l-Baha always emphasized similarities and common ground, unless a fundamental principle was truly at stake, but everything else ‘Abdu’l-Baha said clearly indicated that it was to Baha’u'llah’s teachings that He was committed and in the light of which He weighed everything else. Mary Baker Eddie’s teachings are beautiful and spiritual, but ‘Abdu’l-Baha in several of His writings clearly indicated that the physical universe has a real though relative existence, contrary to Mrs. Eddy’s teaching that the influence of matter and the physical universe are illusory. Again, I think it was ‘Abdu’l-Baha’s way to affirm the basic agreements. This could lead to the misapprehension that He was practically a Christian Scientist.
March 8, 2008 at 1:13 am
Baquia
Frank, thank you for this. I was most enjoyable to find this little nugget of information about Abdu’l-Baha.
March 8, 2008 at 5:10 pm
frankwinters
Hi Bill,
I wish I shared your enthusiasm re all Bahia’s appreciating Whitman and Emerson. Emerson’s thought was different from Baha’i thinking (as i understand it) in that he recommended that we get our wisdom from within ourselves, not from God through a divinely appointed intermediary. He wrote that we all can have the same relationship with the eternal as Jesus did.
Whitman was a free spirit and I believe a homosexual — in any case far too free for most Bahia’s who I find to be at least somewhat narrow minded. Personally I think Abdul Baha probably did appreciate both and I think Hubbard’s essay is quite believable.
As to Christian Science, it seems quite consistent with the Baha’i teaching that the physical world is not the world of reality but that the spiritual world is. Do you see that or am I off base?
Baquia — my pleasure and thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.
Peace,
Frank